<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dreaming about a wolf and a pumpkin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.trudysuggs.com/2009/08/31/dreaming-about-a-wolf-and-a-pumpkin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.trudysuggs.com/2009/08/31/dreaming-about-a-wolf-and-a-pumpkin/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 15:33:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.trudysuggs.com/2009/08/31/dreaming-about-a-wolf-and-a-pumpkin/comment-page-1/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 15:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trudysuggs.com/?p=702#comment-115</guid>
		<description>I had to shake my head while reading the article because one would think in this day and age with all the push to respect and to accept others’ differences that we would see a progressive attitude toward sign language. 

It is unfortunate that while it took the proponents of (American) sign language decades (centuries, even) to bring ASL to the current level of legitimacy only to have people like Dr. Cohen would use their title and give opinions that discredit everything. 

I was boarding a plane one time and a mother, in the line ahead of me, was holding a (12-18 months old, maybe) baby when it (boy? girl? Can’t tell) saw me with my cowboy hat on and signed “hat”. The mother saw it signing and smiled. “Yes, it is a hat,” the mother affirmed. I smiled back because it felt good that she is using sign language with her baby whether the baby is deaf or hearing.

I have no idea who is Dr. Cohen but right now anything else he says will be without merit because he has shot himself in his foot. It’s because he had demonstrated casual approach to the question, without research or much forethought, and I shudder when I think of advices he would give to mothers when they have other kind of questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had to shake my head while reading the article because one would think in this day and age with all the push to respect and to accept others’ differences that we would see a progressive attitude toward sign language. </p>
<p>It is unfortunate that while it took the proponents of (American) sign language decades (centuries, even) to bring ASL to the current level of legitimacy only to have people like Dr. Cohen would use their title and give opinions that discredit everything. </p>
<p>I was boarding a plane one time and a mother, in the line ahead of me, was holding a (12-18 months old, maybe) baby when it (boy? girl? Can’t tell) saw me with my cowboy hat on and signed “hat”. The mother saw it signing and smiled. “Yes, it is a hat,” the mother affirmed. I smiled back because it felt good that she is using sign language with her baby whether the baby is deaf or hearing.</p>
<p>I have no idea who is Dr. Cohen but right now anything else he says will be without merit because he has shot himself in his foot. It’s because he had demonstrated casual approach to the question, without research or much forethought, and I shudder when I think of advices he would give to mothers when they have other kind of questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve C. Baldwin, Ph.D.</title>
		<link>http://www.trudysuggs.com/2009/08/31/dreaming-about-a-wolf-and-a-pumpkin/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve C. Baldwin, Ph.D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 22:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trudysuggs.com/?p=702#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Comment by:  Steve C. Baldwin, Ph.D.

Subject:  Refuting Pediatrician Michael Cohen, M.D.

Each comment written in response to Dr. Cohen’s advice column, especially Trudy Suggs’ own article is all well taken from different angles and perceptions, which are based mostly on actual experience, prior knowledge and academic studies.  I certainly hope you all forwarded your reaction to Fit Pregnancy Magazine, per Suggs’ suggestion.  If the magazine’s readership is 500,000 and probably subscribed by 57,2000 pediatricians (from Internet), your comments will definitely provided the other side of veracity.   Whether there are other Dr. Cohens out there who profess the same “opinion,” we can only hope that is not the case.  Relatively speaking, there are quite a few such ignorant, arrogant, misguided, misinformed and disrespectful doctors with a mindset like Dr. Cohen.   Since Greek time, the cancer of ignorance is alive and well.

It is a matter of sheer coincidence that I am babysitting and housesitting for my hearing daughter and her husband.  My hearing grandson is only 15 months old and a ball of energy and already performs his bilingual skills with aplomb, comfort and confidence.  He picked up some 35 signs and knows 40 spoken words.  My daughter and her husband are not using this approach as a game, nor for the fun of it.  Addionally, it is not a fad and does not in any way serves as a distraction, whatever Dr. Cohen means by that perceptive.  In due time they are definitely expecting their son to speak, hear and recognize more English words without his feeling frustrated emotionally, mentally or intelligently.  Under no circumstances are they expecting a miracle or two. However, it is a wonderful miracle in actuality that the son can handle two languages comfortably and happily.

From a grandfather’s perspective, it amazes me that my grandson can do things most babies cannot:  resort to one sign or two while his mouth is full, code switch in signs and babbling (toddler sounds), and signs concepts spontaneously and naturally.  At the same time he is being visual, tactile and physical.  In other words, signing allows him to put his five senses to work functionally and intelligently (both hemispheres of the brain).  As a certified educator for nearly 40 years, my grandson is not delayed in language, cognizance and sensory development.  In summary, my observation is based on research, experience and training.   Are drawbacks, distraction, game, frustrations or miracles in vogue here?   No overt evidence of Dr. Cohen’s negative opinion at all.

Dr. Cohen needs to be careful about mixing his assumption, opinion and ignorance together to formulate a misconception.  By reading all the comments refuting his advice, maybe he will rethink his opinion, rectify his advice like a real physician and nobly concede his incorrect insight into a domain that is not his area of expertise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment by:  Steve C. Baldwin, Ph.D.</p>
<p>Subject:  Refuting Pediatrician Michael Cohen, M.D.</p>
<p>Each comment written in response to Dr. Cohen’s advice column, especially Trudy Suggs’ own article is all well taken from different angles and perceptions, which are based mostly on actual experience, prior knowledge and academic studies.  I certainly hope you all forwarded your reaction to Fit Pregnancy Magazine, per Suggs’ suggestion.  If the magazine’s readership is 500,000 and probably subscribed by 57,2000 pediatricians (from Internet), your comments will definitely provided the other side of veracity.   Whether there are other Dr. Cohens out there who profess the same “opinion,” we can only hope that is not the case.  Relatively speaking, there are quite a few such ignorant, arrogant, misguided, misinformed and disrespectful doctors with a mindset like Dr. Cohen.   Since Greek time, the cancer of ignorance is alive and well.</p>
<p>It is a matter of sheer coincidence that I am babysitting and housesitting for my hearing daughter and her husband.  My hearing grandson is only 15 months old and a ball of energy and already performs his bilingual skills with aplomb, comfort and confidence.  He picked up some 35 signs and knows 40 spoken words.  My daughter and her husband are not using this approach as a game, nor for the fun of it.  Addionally, it is not a fad and does not in any way serves as a distraction, whatever Dr. Cohen means by that perceptive.  In due time they are definitely expecting their son to speak, hear and recognize more English words without his feeling frustrated emotionally, mentally or intelligently.  Under no circumstances are they expecting a miracle or two. However, it is a wonderful miracle in actuality that the son can handle two languages comfortably and happily.</p>
<p>From a grandfather’s perspective, it amazes me that my grandson can do things most babies cannot:  resort to one sign or two while his mouth is full, code switch in signs and babbling (toddler sounds), and signs concepts spontaneously and naturally.  At the same time he is being visual, tactile and physical.  In other words, signing allows him to put his five senses to work functionally and intelligently (both hemispheres of the brain).  As a certified educator for nearly 40 years, my grandson is not delayed in language, cognizance and sensory development.  In summary, my observation is based on research, experience and training.   Are drawbacks, distraction, game, frustrations or miracles in vogue here?   No overt evidence of Dr. Cohen’s negative opinion at all.</p>
<p>Dr. Cohen needs to be careful about mixing his assumption, opinion and ignorance together to formulate a misconception.  By reading all the comments refuting his advice, maybe he will rethink his opinion, rectify his advice like a real physician and nobly concede his incorrect insight into a domain that is not his area of expertise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keelan Sears</title>
		<link>http://www.trudysuggs.com/2009/08/31/dreaming-about-a-wolf-and-a-pumpkin/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Keelan Sears</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 03:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trudysuggs.com/?p=702#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Honestly, I think that it’s ridiculous to say that ASL at a young age hinders any sort of learning from then on. That’s what kids are built for; learning and recognizing patterns. It’s not hard to learn two languages, especially when you’re totally immersed in both of them. The kid is still going to hear people talking around him/her, and still pick it up and learn it whether you want it or not. 
	Cohen writes- “The parents’ enthusiasm actually reinforces the babies’ not talking. This is not a very big deal, however-eventually, they all learn to talk”. So then what the hell is the problem? First, Cohen states that “it may have some drawbacks”. Then, only sentences later, ends with the bottom line conclusion that “It won’t do any real harm, but it won’t work any miracles, either”. It’s not even being thought of as a miracle, but an easy way to communicate with your child and get a jumpstart on the second language deal. Dr. Cohen seems like he is trying to dig an issue out of thin air, making a pointless argument that next to no one agrees with. Dr. Cohen isn’t even deaf, so who is he to place to deem a language unsuitable for a child when he probably can’t even comprehend it’s flexibility to express emotion. Really, just a stupid thing to argue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, I think that it’s ridiculous to say that ASL at a young age hinders any sort of learning from then on. That’s what kids are built for; learning and recognizing patterns. It’s not hard to learn two languages, especially when you’re totally immersed in both of them. The kid is still going to hear people talking around him/her, and still pick it up and learn it whether you want it or not.<br />
	Cohen writes- “The parents’ enthusiasm actually reinforces the babies’ not talking. This is not a very big deal, however-eventually, they all learn to talk”. So then what the hell is the problem? First, Cohen states that “it may have some drawbacks”. Then, only sentences later, ends with the bottom line conclusion that “It won’t do any real harm, but it won’t work any miracles, either”. It’s not even being thought of as a miracle, but an easy way to communicate with your child and get a jumpstart on the second language deal. Dr. Cohen seems like he is trying to dig an issue out of thin air, making a pointless argument that next to no one agrees with. Dr. Cohen isn’t even deaf, so who is he to place to deem a language unsuitable for a child when he probably can’t even comprehend it’s flexibility to express emotion. Really, just a stupid thing to argue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert Walla</title>
		<link>http://www.trudysuggs.com/2009/08/31/dreaming-about-a-wolf-and-a-pumpkin/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert Walla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 13:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trudysuggs.com/?p=702#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Oh My G-D,
Whats wrong with the doctor?  he has nerve to make the statement in national wide magazines where many parents are reading his articles.  They may believe in him.  I assume he is Jewish because of his last name.  What would we say about Yiddish language?  It is only a game?  it will hurt the children in real world?  Don&#039;t let the parents teach children their Yiddish language because it will delay the children s &quot;real language&quot; in the countries where they live.  I am disappointed in Jewish doctor who gives Jewish people bad name.  I am Jewish myself. so don&#039;t attack me if you think it is anti jewish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh My G-D,<br />
Whats wrong with the doctor?  he has nerve to make the statement in national wide magazines where many parents are reading his articles.  They may believe in him.  I assume he is Jewish because of his last name.  What would we say about Yiddish language?  It is only a game?  it will hurt the children in real world?  Don&#8217;t let the parents teach children their Yiddish language because it will delay the children s &#8220;real language&#8221; in the countries where they live.  I am disappointed in Jewish doctor who gives Jewish people bad name.  I am Jewish myself. so don&#8217;t attack me if you think it is anti jewish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linsay Darnall, Jr.</title>
		<link>http://www.trudysuggs.com/2009/08/31/dreaming-about-a-wolf-and-a-pumpkin/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Linsay Darnall, Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 19:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trudysuggs.com/?p=702#comment-12</guid>
		<description>I had to shake my head while reading the article because one would think in this day and age with all the push to respect and to accept others’ differences that we would see a progressive attitude toward sign language. 

It is unfortunate that while it took the proponents of (American) sign language decades (centuries, even) to bring ASL to the current level of legitimacy only to have people like Dr. Cohen would use their title and give opinions that discredit everything. 

I was boarding a plane one time and a mother, in the line ahead of me, was holding a (12-18 months old, maybe) baby when it (boy? girl? Can’t tell) saw me with my cowboy hat on and signed “hat”. The mother saw it signing and smiled. “Yes, it is a hat,” the mother affirmed. I smiled back because it felt good that she is using sign language with her baby whether the baby is deaf or hearing.

I have no idea who is Dr. Cohen but right now anything else he says will be without merit because he has shot himself in his foot. It’s because he had demonstrated casual approach to the question, without research or much forethought, and I shudder when I think of advices he would give to mothers when they have other kind of questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had to shake my head while reading the article because one would think in this day and age with all the push to respect and to accept others’ differences that we would see a progressive attitude toward sign language. </p>
<p>It is unfortunate that while it took the proponents of (American) sign language decades (centuries, even) to bring ASL to the current level of legitimacy only to have people like Dr. Cohen would use their title and give opinions that discredit everything. </p>
<p>I was boarding a plane one time and a mother, in the line ahead of me, was holding a (12-18 months old, maybe) baby when it (boy? girl? Can’t tell) saw me with my cowboy hat on and signed “hat”. The mother saw it signing and smiled. “Yes, it is a hat,” the mother affirmed. I smiled back because it felt good that she is using sign language with her baby whether the baby is deaf or hearing.</p>
<p>I have no idea who is Dr. Cohen but right now anything else he says will be without merit because he has shot himself in his foot. It’s because he had demonstrated casual approach to the question, without research or much forethought, and I shudder when I think of advices he would give to mothers when they have other kind of questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amy</title>
		<link>http://www.trudysuggs.com/2009/08/31/dreaming-about-a-wolf-and-a-pumpkin/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 16:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trudysuggs.com/?p=702#comment-11</guid>
		<description>I have to say I was disappointed to read Dr. Cohen&#039;s opinion on teaching young children sign language. Though I recognize we all have a right to an opinion, I am surprised that his perspective on it is merely &quot;it should be taught as a game&quot; and that it has no real language merit. I am a mother of six hearing children. Before I became a stay-at-home mom I was a full-time certified interpreter. I recognized the value in early communication and jumped at the opportunity to teach my young ones language in any and every form as soon as they were born. I can&#039;t count the times my children have communicated very complete thoughts to me before they were even 10 months old. From astonished &quot;rain gone&quot; signs to &quot;medicine mouth&quot; when they were teething. All but one went on to be an early talker. I am very grateful I took the time to sign with them and would encourage all young moms and dads to do the same. Commitment to it and consistency is the key to success! 
Sincerely,
Amy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say I was disappointed to read Dr. Cohen&#8217;s opinion on teaching young children sign language. Though I recognize we all have a right to an opinion, I am surprised that his perspective on it is merely &#8220;it should be taught as a game&#8221; and that it has no real language merit. I am a mother of six hearing children. Before I became a stay-at-home mom I was a full-time certified interpreter. I recognized the value in early communication and jumped at the opportunity to teach my young ones language in any and every form as soon as they were born. I can&#8217;t count the times my children have communicated very complete thoughts to me before they were even 10 months old. From astonished &#8220;rain gone&#8221; signs to &#8220;medicine mouth&#8221; when they were teething. All but one went on to be an early talker. I am very grateful I took the time to sign with them and would encourage all young moms and dads to do the same. Commitment to it and consistency is the key to success!<br />
Sincerely,<br />
Amy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Parrish Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.trudysuggs.com/2009/08/31/dreaming-about-a-wolf-and-a-pumpkin/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Parrish Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trudysuggs.com/?p=702#comment-10</guid>
		<description>I agree with everything you said--and yes, send a tape to him!

Unfortunately, it&#039;s just another example in a long line of doctors in the medical establishment that just don&#039;t get it.

How would he feel if we said speech is a game? Which I don&#039;t believe, of course, but just to compare? Simply the fact that most people in the world speak and a smaller percentage of us sign doesn&#039;t mean what we use for communication should be trivialized.

Imagine ... if somehow mankind had veered towards manual communication permanently, and never talked. Would be interesting, that.

J. Parrish Lewis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with everything you said&#8211;and yes, send a tape to him!</p>
<p>Unfortunately, it&#8217;s just another example in a long line of doctors in the medical establishment that just don&#8217;t get it.</p>
<p>How would he feel if we said speech is a game? Which I don&#8217;t believe, of course, but just to compare? Simply the fact that most people in the world speak and a smaller percentage of us sign doesn&#8217;t mean what we use for communication should be trivialized.</p>
<p>Imagine &#8230; if somehow mankind had veered towards manual communication permanently, and never talked. Would be interesting, that.</p>
<p>J. Parrish Lewis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://www.trudysuggs.com/2009/08/31/dreaming-about-a-wolf-and-a-pumpkin/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trudysuggs.com/?p=702#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Apparently, Dr. Cohen does not realize the value of bilingualism. The ability to acquire two or more language greatly improves the child&#039;s learning later in life. I guess Dr. Cohen supports the ONE language theory and if he says that sign language is a &quot;game&quot; then he does not clearly understand the theory of language.

You have Vygotsky social Development Theory that states the child learns from traits and the opportunity for a language to be learned. No matter what the language is being taught, the child acquires it and use it to their benefit in order to communicate. 

As a word of warning to the parents, it seems that Dr. Cohen gives the wrong advice then I fear that there are more advice that he gives which goes against the child&#039;s learning development.

Also, I am a Teacher and I can argue against Dr. Cohen any day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently, Dr. Cohen does not realize the value of bilingualism. The ability to acquire two or more language greatly improves the child&#8217;s learning later in life. I guess Dr. Cohen supports the ONE language theory and if he says that sign language is a &#8220;game&#8221; then he does not clearly understand the theory of language.</p>
<p>You have Vygotsky social Development Theory that states the child learns from traits and the opportunity for a language to be learned. No matter what the language is being taught, the child acquires it and use it to their benefit in order to communicate. </p>
<p>As a word of warning to the parents, it seems that Dr. Cohen gives the wrong advice then I fear that there are more advice that he gives which goes against the child&#8217;s learning development.</p>
<p>Also, I am a Teacher and I can argue against Dr. Cohen any day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Pirone</title>
		<link>http://www.trudysuggs.com/2009/08/31/dreaming-about-a-wolf-and-a-pumpkin/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>John Pirone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 23:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trudysuggs.com/?p=702#comment-7</guid>
		<description>My response to him - he degrades our language!

&quot;In my practice, I also see delays in talking among some babies whose parents practice signing with them. The parents’ enthusiasm actually reinforces the babies’ not talking...&quot;

Dr. Cohen&#039;s observation is purely unfounded and if it is true then how can he refute the argument that many CODAs (thousands of them) are fluent in two languages - English and ASL?  They learned ASL first at an early age before they started to learn Spoken English. 

I will support Dr. Cohen if he meant to say, &quot;In my practice, I also see delays in ASL among some babies whose parents practice oral methods with them.  The parents&#039; enthusiasm actually reinforces the babies&#039; not signing...&quot;  

Dr. Cohen thinks of ASL as a game is oppressive and it totally degrades our language.  Who gives him a right to judge a language that he has never acquired?  He needs to refrain from making any statements on something he&#039;s unfamiliar with and he needs to do what he&#039;s preached by his medical professors - research!  It&#039;s not hard to find American Annals for the Deaf and Oxford&#039;s Journal of Deaf Studies/Deaf Education and they provide many studies that say that ASL actually helps speech development.  

I&#039;d like to think Dr. Cohen&#039;s response as a game because he strategically tells the readers that ASL does not provide any values in one&#039;s speech development.  This game needs to put to end and he has to apologize to the deaf community for making a public statement that degrades our language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My response to him &#8211; he degrades our language!</p>
<p>&#8220;In my practice, I also see delays in talking among some babies whose parents practice signing with them. The parents’ enthusiasm actually reinforces the babies’ not talking&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Dr. Cohen&#8217;s observation is purely unfounded and if it is true then how can he refute the argument that many CODAs (thousands of them) are fluent in two languages &#8211; English and ASL?  They learned ASL first at an early age before they started to learn Spoken English. </p>
<p>I will support Dr. Cohen if he meant to say, &#8220;In my practice, I also see delays in ASL among some babies whose parents practice oral methods with them.  The parents&#8217; enthusiasm actually reinforces the babies&#8217; not signing&#8230;&#8221;  </p>
<p>Dr. Cohen thinks of ASL as a game is oppressive and it totally degrades our language.  Who gives him a right to judge a language that he has never acquired?  He needs to refrain from making any statements on something he&#8217;s unfamiliar with and he needs to do what he&#8217;s preached by his medical professors &#8211; research!  It&#8217;s not hard to find American Annals for the Deaf and Oxford&#8217;s Journal of Deaf Studies/Deaf Education and they provide many studies that say that ASL actually helps speech development.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to think Dr. Cohen&#8217;s response as a game because he strategically tells the readers that ASL does not provide any values in one&#8217;s speech development.  This game needs to put to end and he has to apologize to the deaf community for making a public statement that degrades our language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Commerson</title>
		<link>http://www.trudysuggs.com/2009/08/31/dreaming-about-a-wolf-and-a-pumpkin/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Commerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 22:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trudysuggs.com/?p=702#comment-6</guid>
		<description>&quot;Dr. Michael Cohen&#039;s Opinion is the Real Distraction&quot;

Dr. Cohen,

You call yourself a doctor?  Did you take the Hippocratic Oath?

&quot;Above all, do no harm&quot;

Do you realize how much harm you&#039;ve caused by sharing your baseless
&quot;opinion&quot;?  Do you realize that hundreds of thousands of deaf babies
have been and are being denied of their human right to develop a
language because of the simple destructive myth that signing impedes
speech development?  Do no harm?  With your medical degree, you are to
uphold an academic integrity by sharing professional &quot;opinion&quot; based
on researches and proven facts such as that sign language increases
cognitive skills, for example.  There is NOT ONE evidence that sign
language is bad for babies.  Sign Language may very well be one of the
very few modalities that can connect all of humanity on the most
humane level, which is something that spoken or written modalities can
never achieve.

So-called doctor, do your research before you harm any more babies.

Your Hippocratic Oath should be revoked.

Ryan Commerson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Dr. Michael Cohen&#8217;s Opinion is the Real Distraction&#8221;</p>
<p>Dr. Cohen,</p>
<p>You call yourself a doctor?  Did you take the Hippocratic Oath?</p>
<p>&#8220;Above all, do no harm&#8221;</p>
<p>Do you realize how much harm you&#8217;ve caused by sharing your baseless<br />
&#8220;opinion&#8221;?  Do you realize that hundreds of thousands of deaf babies<br />
have been and are being denied of their human right to develop a<br />
language because of the simple destructive myth that signing impedes<br />
speech development?  Do no harm?  With your medical degree, you are to<br />
uphold an academic integrity by sharing professional &#8220;opinion&#8221; based<br />
on researches and proven facts such as that sign language increases<br />
cognitive skills, for example.  There is NOT ONE evidence that sign<br />
language is bad for babies.  Sign Language may very well be one of the<br />
very few modalities that can connect all of humanity on the most<br />
humane level, which is something that spoken or written modalities can<br />
never achieve.</p>
<p>So-called doctor, do your research before you harm any more babies.</p>
<p>Your Hippocratic Oath should be revoked.</p>
<p>Ryan Commerson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

